| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZH-rJFQhfWNLbSoKhHzTQmLf0TaAJbL-XtvatbMeuVKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 09:24:48 -0800
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: vmscan: ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:18 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 3:56 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yosry,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> > [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20230228]
> > [cannot apply to vbabka-slab/for-next xfs-linux/for-next v6.2]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yosry-Ahmed/mm-vmscan-refactor-updating-reclaimed-pages-in-reclaim_state/20230228-165214
> > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228085002.2592473-3-yosryahmed%40google.com
> > patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: vmscan: ignore non-LRU-based reclaim in memcg reclaim
> > config: i386-randconfig-a002-20230227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230228/202302281933.vU1PHuZr-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/f6d2b849f186a927925a29e289d60895048550f5
> > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
> > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Yosry-Ahmed/mm-vmscan-refactor-updating-reclaimed-pages-in-reclaim_state/20230228-165214
> > git checkout f6d2b849f186a927925a29e289d60895048550f5
> > # save the config file
> > mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
> > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302281933.vU1PHuZr-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> mm/vmscan.c:549:13: error: redefinition of 'cgroup_reclaim'
> > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > mm/vmscan.c:191:13: note: previous definition is here
> > static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > >> mm/vmscan.c:554:13: error: redefinition of 'global_reclaim'
> > static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > mm/vmscan.c:196:13: note: previous definition is here
> > static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > ^
> > 2 errors generated.
>
> Ugh yeah I didn't realize I am moving the definitions from within an
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG. I will just leave the definitions as-is and add a
> forward declaration before the definition of
> add_non_vmscan_reclaimed(), should also reduce the churn in the diff.
> Will wait for a bit before re-spinning to gather some feedback on the
> current version first.
I can also just move all the reclaim state functions
(set_task_reclaim_state(), report_freed_pages(),
add_non_vmscan_reclaimed()) below that #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG.
Might also name them more consistently.
>
> >
> >
> > vim +/cgroup_reclaim +549 mm/vmscan.c
> >
> > 86750830468506 Yang Shi 2021-05-04 548
> > b5ead35e7e1d34 Johannes Weiner 2019-11-30 @549 static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > 89b5fae5368f6a Johannes Weiner 2012-01-12 550 {
> > b5ead35e7e1d34 Johannes Weiner 2019-11-30 551 return false;
> > 89b5fae5368f6a Johannes Weiner 2012-01-12 552 }
> > 97c9341f727105 Tejun Heo 2015-05-22 553
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 @554 static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 555 {
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 556 return true;
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 557 }
> > a579086c99ed70 Yu Zhao 2022-12-21 558
> >
> > --
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists