[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230228184245.1585775-1-bjorn@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:42:44 +0100
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/test_string.c: Make definition less dense
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
Checkpatch seems to have trouble making sense of the situation when
struct definitions, variable definitions, and __initconst marking is
done in one go.
Let's be nicer to checkpatch, and move the struct definition out,
which removes the error.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
---
lib/test_string.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_string.c b/lib/test_string.c
index c5cb92fb710e..550229084c41 100644
--- a/lib/test_string.c
+++ b/lib/test_string.c
@@ -179,15 +179,17 @@ static __init int strnchr_selftest(void)
return 0;
}
+struct strspn_test {
+ const char str[16];
+ const char accept[16];
+ const char reject[16];
+ unsigned int a;
+ unsigned int r;
+};
+
static __init int strspn_selftest(void)
{
- static const struct strspn_test {
- const char str[16];
- const char accept[16];
- const char reject[16];
- unsigned a;
- unsigned r;
- } tests[] __initconst = {
+ static const struct strspn_test tests[] __initconst = {
{ "foobar", "", "", 0, 6 },
{ "abba", "abc", "ABBA", 4, 4 },
{ "abba", "a", "b", 1, 1 },
base-commit: ae3419fbac845b4d3f3a9fae4cc80c68d82cdf6e
--
2.37.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists