[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/5eQKeEYLvIxKEm@p183>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 23:04:16 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
paul@...l-moore.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] capability: add cap_isidentical
> +static inline bool cap_isidentical(const kernel_cap_t a, const kernel_cap_t b)
> +{
> + unsigned __capi;
> + CAP_FOR_EACH_U32(__capi) {
> + if (a.cap[__capi] != b.cap[__capi])
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
capability_eq() maybe? "isidentical" is kind of ugly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists