linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/19] 5.10.171-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31339d95-a318-ba2e-fdb0-ea7b102fd6fd@sladewatkins.net>
Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:09:52 -0500
From:   Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     kuniyu@...zon.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/19] 5.10.171-rc1 review

On 3/1/23 17:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.171 release.
>> There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
> 
> AFAICT we should not need this patch -- we don't have b5fc29233d28 in
> 5.10, so the assertion seems to be at the correct place here.

This (b5fc29233d28be7a3322848ebe73ac327559cdb9) appears to be in linux-5.10.y,
though?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=b5fc29233d28be7a3322848ebe73ac327559cdb9

Confused,
-- Slade

> 
>> Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
>>     net: Remove WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_forward_alloc) from
>>     sk_stream_kill_queues().
> 
> CIP testing did not find any problems here:                                                             
>                                                                                                         
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-5.10.y