| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Y//dGe+uXnvNjkvn@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 01:17:45 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"peterhuewe@....de" <peterhuewe@....de>,
"jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch V5 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 03:32:24AM +0000, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 28 February 2023 08:06
> > To: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
> > Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; broonie@...nel.org; peterhuewe@....de;
> > jgg@...pe.ca; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org;
> > linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org; linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; thierry.reding@...il.com; Jonathan Hunter
> > <jonathanh@...dia.com>; Sowjanya Komatineni
> > <skomatineni@...dia.com>; Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Patch V5 2/3] tpm_tis-spi: Support hardware wait polling
> >
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 05:37:01PM +0530, Krishna Yarlagadda wrote:
> > > TPM devices raise wait signal on last addr cycle. This can be detected
> > > by software driver by reading MISO line on same clock which requires
> > > full duplex support. In case of half duplex controllers wait detection
> > > has to be implemented in HW.
> > > Support hardware wait state detection by sending entire message and let
> > > controller handle flow control.
> >
> > When a is started sentence with the word "support" it translates to "I'm
> > too lazy to write a proper and verbose description of the implementation"
> > :-)
> >
> > It has some abstract ideas of the implementation, I give you that, but do
> > you think anyone ever will get any value of reading that honestly? A bit
> > more concrette description of the change helps e.g. when bisecting bugs.
> >
> I presented why we are making the change. Will add explanation on how
> it is implemented as well.
OK, cool, thank you.
>
> > > QSPI controller in Tegra236 & Tegra241 implement TPM wait polling.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c | 92
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> > > index a0963a3e92bd..5f66448ee09e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
> > > @@ -71,8 +71,74 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_flow_control(struct
> > tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> > > - u8 *in, const u8 *out)
> > > +/*
> > > + * Half duplex controller with support for TPM wait state detection like
> > > + * Tegra241 need cmd, addr & data sent in single message to manage HW
> > flow
> > > + * control. Each phase sent in different transfer for controller to idenity
> > > + * phase.
> > > + */
> > > +int tpm_tis_spi_hw_flow_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> > u16 len,
> > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out)
> > > +{
> > > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
> > > + struct spi_transfer spi_xfer[3];
> > > + struct spi_message m;
> > > + u8 transfer_len;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + while (len) {
> > > + transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE);
> > > +
> > > + spi_message_init(&m);
> > > + phy->iobuf[0] = (in ? 0x80 : 0) | (transfer_len - 1);
> > > + phy->iobuf[1] = 0xd4;
> > > + phy->iobuf[2] = addr >> 8;
> > > + phy->iobuf[3] = addr;
> > > +
> > > + memset(&spi_xfer, 0, sizeof(spi_xfer));
> > > +
> > > + spi_xfer[0].tx_buf = phy->iobuf;
> > > + spi_xfer[0].len = 1;
> > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[0], &m);
> > > +
> > > + spi_xfer[1].tx_buf = phy->iobuf + 1;
> > > + spi_xfer[1].len = 3;
> > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[1], &m);
> > > +
> > > + if (out) {
> > > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4];
> > > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = NULL;
> > > + memcpy(&phy->iobuf[4], out, transfer_len);
> > > + out += transfer_len;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (in) {
> > > + spi_xfer[2].tx_buf = NULL;
> > > + spi_xfer[2].rx_buf = &phy->iobuf[4];
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + spi_xfer[2].len = transfer_len;
> > > + spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer[2], &m);
> > > +
> > > + reinit_completion(&phy->ready);
> > > +
> > > + ret = spi_sync_locked(phy->spi_device, &m);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (in) {
> > > + memcpy(in, &phy->iobuf[4], transfer_len);
> > > + in += transfer_len;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + len -= transfer_len;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int tpm_tis_spi_sw_flow_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> > u16 len,
> > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out)
> > > {
> > > struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > @@ -140,6 +206,28 @@ int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data
> > *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> > > + u8 *in, const u8 *out)
> > > +{
> > > + struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
> > > + struct spi_controller *ctlr = phy->spi_device->controller;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * TPM flow control over SPI requires full duplex support.
> > > + * Send entire message to a half duplex controller to handle
> > > + * wait polling in controller.
> > > + * Set TPM HW flow control flag..
> > > + */
> > > + if (ctlr->flags & SPI_CONTROLLER_HALF_DUPLEX) {
> > > + phy->spi_device->mode |= SPI_TPM_HW_FLOW;
> > > + return tpm_tis_spi_hw_flow_transfer(data, addr, len, in,
> > > + out);
> > > + } else {
> > > + return tpm_tis_spi_sw_flow_transfer(data, addr, len, in,
> > > + out);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> > > u16 len, u8 *result, enum tpm_tis_io_mode io_mode)
> > > {
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > Looking pretty good but do you really want to export
> > tpm_tis_spi_{hw,sw}_flow_transfer?
> >
> > BR, Jarkko
> No need to export tpm_tis_spi_{hw,sw}_flow_transfer as well.
> I will update this in next version.
Great.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists