[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f95a452e-089b-b92b-d5e5-941db4d64c9c@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 13:57:34 +0800
From: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<coresight@...ts.linaro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Hao Zhang <quic_hazha@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Tao Zhang <taozha@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] coresight-tpdm: Initialize DSB subunit
configuration
Hi,
在 2/28/2023 7:16 PM, Suzuki K Poulose 写道:
> On 19/01/2023 07:41, Tao Zhang wrote:
>> DSB subunit need to be configured in enablement and disablement.
>> A struct that specifics associated to dsb dataset is needed. It
>> saves the configuration and parameters of the dsb datasets. This
>> change is to add this struct and initialize the configuration of
>> DSB subunit.
>
> Please could add a line about the type of things you can do with DSB.
> e.g, Timestamp, trigger type etc ? The description seems to be
> describing the code, rather than the functionality of the code.
>
Sure, I will add more information according to your advice in the next
version of the patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <taozha@....qualcomm.com>
>
> As pointed out on the previous response by someone else, please fix the
> above to single.
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 57
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 17 +++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> index d85ca96..6befc87 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>> @@ -24,13 +24,35 @@ static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>> {
>> u32 val;
>> + val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
>> + /* Set trigger timestamp */
>> + if (drvdata->dsb->trig_ts)
>> + val |= TPDM_DSB_XTRIG_TSENAB;
>> + else
>> + val &= ~TPDM_DSB_XTRIG_TSENAB;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_TIER);
>> +
>> + val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>> + /* Set trigger type */
>> + if (drvdata->dsb->trig_type)
>> + val |= TPDM_DSB_TRIG_TYPE;
>> + else
>> + val &= ~TPDM_DSB_TRIG_TYPE;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>> +
>> /* Set the enable bit of DSB control register to 1 */
>> val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>> val |= TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA;
>> writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
>
> Do they have to be written out separately ? Why not combine the value
> updates to the TPDM_DSB_CR ?
>
Sure, I will combine the value in the next version of the patch.
>
>> }
>> -/* TPDM enable operations */
>> +/* TPDM enable operations
>
> Minor nit: Comment style issues.
>
>
>> + * The TPDM or Monitor serves as data collection component for various
>> + * dataset types. It covers Basic Counts(BC), Tenure Counts(TC),
>> + * Continuous Multi-Bit(CMB), Multi-lane CMB(MCMB) and Discrete Single
>> + * Bit(DSB). This function will initialize the configuration according
>> + * to the dataset type supported by the TPDM.
>> + */
>> static void __tpdm_enable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> {
>> CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> @@ -110,15 +132,33 @@ static const struct coresight_ops tpdm_cs_ops = {
>> .source_ops = &tpdm_source_ops,
>> };
>> -static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +static void tpdm_datasets_setup(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> {
>> u32 pidr;
>> - CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
>> /* Get the datasets present on the TPDM. */
>> pidr = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + CORESIGHT_PERIPHIDR0);
>> drvdata->datasets |= pidr & GENMASK(TPDM_DATASETS - 1, 0);
>> - CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tpdm_datasets_alloc(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + if (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB) {
>> + drvdata->dsb = devm_kzalloc(drvdata->dev,
>> sizeof(*drvdata->dsb),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!drvdata->dsb)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Couldn't this be moved into the init_default_data() ?
>
>> +static void tpdm_init_default_data(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + if (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB) {
>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_ts = true;
>> + drvdata->dsb->trig_type = false;
>
>
>
>> + }
>> }
>
> It looks a bit silly to move the initialisation to a separate
> function. Please could you fold this to tpdm_datasets_alloc() and may
> be even
> rename that function to tpdm_init_datasets() ?
Sure, I will update the code according to your advice in the next
version of the patch.
>
> Suzuki
>
>> /*
>> @@ -181,6 +221,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev,
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>> struct coresight_platform_data *pdata;
>> struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata;
>> struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 };
>> + int ret;
>> pdata = coresight_get_platform_data(dev);
>> if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>> @@ -200,6 +241,8 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev,
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>> drvdata->base = base;
>> + tpdm_datasets_setup(drvdata);
>> +
>> /* Set up coresight component description */
>> desc.name = coresight_alloc_device_name(&tpdm_devs, dev);
>> if (!desc.name)
>> @@ -216,7 +259,13 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev,
>> const struct amba_id *id)
>> return PTR_ERR(drvdata->csdev);
>> spin_lock_init(&drvdata->spinlock);
>> + ret = tpdm_datasets_alloc(drvdata);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> tpdm_init_default_data(drvdata);
>> +
>> /* Decrease pm refcount when probe is done.*/
>> pm_runtime_put(&adev->dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> index 5438540..3ad1be5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
>> @@ -11,8 +11,14 @@
>> /* DSB Subunit Registers */
>> #define TPDM_DSB_CR (0x780)
>> +#define TPDM_DSB_TIER (0x784)
>> +
>> /* Enable bit for DSB subunit */
>> #define TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA BIT(0)
>> +/* Enable bit for DSB subunit trigger timestamp */
>> +#define TPDM_DSB_XTRIG_TSENAB BIT(1)
>> +/* Enable bit for DSB subunit trigger type */
>> +#define TPDM_DSB_TRIG_TYPE BIT(12)
>> /* TPDM integration test registers */
>> #define TPDM_ITATBCNTRL (0xEF0)
>> @@ -41,6 +47,16 @@
>> #define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB BIT(1)
>> /**
>> + * struct dsb_dataset - specifics associated to dsb dataset
>> + * @trig_ts: Enable/Disable trigger timestamp.
>> + * @trig_type: Enable/Disable trigger type.
>> + */
>> +struct dsb_dataset {
>> + bool trig_ts;
>> + bool trig_type;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> * struct tpdm_drvdata - specifics associated to an TPDM component
>> * @base: memory mapped base address for this component.
>> * @dev: The device entity associated to this component.
>> @@ -57,6 +73,7 @@ struct tpdm_drvdata {
>> spinlock_t spinlock;
>> bool enable;
>> unsigned long datasets;
>> + struct dsb_dataset *dsb;
>> };
>> #endif /* _CORESIGHT_CORESIGHT_TPDM_H */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists