linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2023 18:02:54 +0530
From:   Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Disha Talreja <dishaa.talreja@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] sched/numa: Enhance vma scanning

On 3/1/2023 9:46 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> On 3/1/2023 2:54 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 10:20:18 +0530 Raghavendra K T 
>> <raghavendra.kt@....com> wrote:
>>
>>>   The patchset proposes one of the enhancements to numa vma scanning
>>> suggested by Mel. This is continuation of [3].
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>   include/linux/mm.h       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   include/linux/mm_types.h |  9 +++++++
>>>   kernel/fork.c            |  2 ++
>>>   kernel/sched/fair.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   mm/memory.c              |  3 +++
>>
>> It's unclear (to me) which tree would normally carry these.
>>
>> But there are significant textual conflicts with the "Per-VMA locks"
>> patchset, and there might be functional issues as well.  So mm.git
>> would be the better choice.
>>
>> Please can you redo and retest against tomorrow's mm-unstable branch
>> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm)?  Hopefully the
>> sched developers can take a look and provide feedback.
>>
> 
> Thank you Andrew. Sure will do that.
> 

Thanks again, Sent rebased patches,

Just to record, so that new discussion can happen in new posting

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1677672277.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com/T/#t