[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/9SjIDSss390Ki/@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 13:26:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AUTOSEL process
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:28:23PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> In an ideal world, all maintainers would properly mark their patches for
> stable backporting (as documented for the past 15+ years, with a cc:
> stable tag, NOT a Fixes: tag), but we do not live in that world, and
> hence, the need for the AUTOSEL work.
Just as a datapoint here: I stopped making any effort to copy stable on
things due to AUTOSEL, it's pulling back so much more than I would
consider for stable that it no longer seems worthwhile to try to make
decisions about what might fit.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists