linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] jfs updates for 6.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whe=S2BRMm63S6p53U6zOraSeb5K9zugNnBpqQjWe7fAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2023 08:50:13 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] jfs updates for 6.3

On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 8:02 AM Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Arrgh! Right after sending this I realized I hadn't even pushed my local
> jfs-next branch and it hasn't been in linux-next. It's a very low-risk
> patch, but ignore this request if you'd like to.

Heh. For basically a one-liner sign check, I really don't mind. That
patch looks like something that could have gone in as a fix after the
merge window.

Yes, we have rules, but no rule is _that_ black and white.

I appreciate the "oops, this missed linux-next", though, even if it
really doesn't matter for something like this ;)

           Linus