[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230301174309.5nqul7vg5uygwtpy@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 19:43:09 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Implementation of fwnode_operations :: device_get_match_data()
for software nodes?
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 07:33:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Yes, that's why I remember overlays approach and FPGA case.
>
> I guess you have very similar requirements to get this done: your case is a
> particular one for FPGA, i.e. (re-)loading the same HW layout over and over.
>
> I believe it should be discussed with them being involved. We don't want to
> have two approaches of similar things in the kernel.
I don't think comparisons with the denatured case are helpful.
Is "ax + b = 0" a quadratic equation? Well, yes, if you consider it to
be a particular case where the coefficient of x^2 is 0. Do you use
quadratic equation techniques to solve it? No.
I agree we don't want to have multiple approaches of doing the same thing,
but I debate whether I am really doing the same thing?
If software nodes are not designed to be a good fit for my kind of use
case, then what are they designed for?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists