linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: btrfs: Document the influence of wq_cpu_set to thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Mar 2023 09:06:30 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
Cc:     Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Btrfs Mailing List <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fsdevel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        GNU/Weeb Mailing List <gwml@...r.gnuweeb.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] Documentation: btrfs: Document the influence
 of wq_cpu_set to thread_pool option

On 2/27/23 17:02, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 09:15:58AM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> Why will the behavior be introduced in such future version (6.5)?
> 
> It's not like it has been staged for the next merge window. It's still
> in an RFC state. The changes are not trivial and need further review.
> 
> I don't know if it can hit the next merge window. As such, I picked a
> long distance for this proposal. If it ends up going upstream sooner, we
> can change this document.
> 

OK, thanks!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara