linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167769781753.18258.945686895645404447.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:10:17 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER_LONG if target is
 bpf for LoongArch

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:03:01 +0800 you wrote:
> If target is bpf, there is no __loongarch__ definition, __BITS_PER_LONG
> defaults to 32, __NR_nanosleep is not defined:
> 
>   #if defined(__ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS) || __BITS_PER_LONG != 32
>   #define __NR_nanosleep 101
>   __SC_3264(__NR_nanosleep, sys_nanosleep_time32, sys_nanosleep)
>   #endif
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3] selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER_LONG if target is bpf for LoongArch
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be35f4af719c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html