linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] vfs: avoid duplicating creds in faccessat if possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6400fb4b.a70a0220.39788.048e@mx.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2023 11:38:50 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc:     Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, serge@...lyn.com,
        paul@...l-moore.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] vfs: avoid duplicating creds in faccessat if
 possible

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:10:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:03 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > It might be best if we actually exposed it as a SLAB_SKIP_ZERO thing,
> > just to make it possible to say - exactly in situations like this -
> > that this particular slab cache has no advantage from pre-zeroing.
> 
> Actually, maybe it's just as well to keep it per-allocation, and just
> special-case getname_flags() itself.
> 
> We could replace the __getname() there with just a
> 
>         kmem_cache_alloc(names_cachep, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_SKIP_ZERO);
> 
> we're going to overwrite the beginning of the buffer with the path we
> copy from user space, and then we'd have to make people comfortable
> with the fact that even with zero initialization hardening on, the
> space after the filename wouldn't be initialized...

Yeah, I'd love to have a way to safely opt-out of always-zero. The
discussion[1] when we originally did this devolved into a guessing
game on performance since no one could actually point to workloads
that were affected by it, beyond skbuff[2]. So in the interest of not
over-engineering a solution to an unknown problem, the plan was once
someone found a problem, we could find a sensible solution at that
time. And so here we are! :)

I'd always wanted to avoid a "don't zero" flag and instead adjust APIs so
the allocation could include a callback to do the memory content filling
that would return a size-that-was-initialized result. That way we don't
end up in the situations we've seen so many times with drivers, etc,
where an uninit buffer is handed off and some path fails to actually
fill it with anything. However, in practice, I think this kind of API
change becomes really hard to do.

-Kees

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190514143537.10435-4-glider@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190514143537.10435-5-glider@google.com/

-- 
Kees Cook