[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAAPBFfqP671N4ue@T590>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 10:50:44 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>,
Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@....com>,
Matias Bjorling <Matias.Bjorling@....com>,
Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: ublk: enable zoned storage support
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:05:01PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> Add zoned storage support to ublk: report_zones and operations:
> - REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN
> - REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE
> - REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH
> - REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET
>
> This allows implementation of zoned storage devices in user space. An
> example user space implementation based on ubdsrv is available [1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/metaspace/ubdsrv/commit/14a2b708f74f70cfecb076d92e680dc718cc1f6d
As I suggested, please write one simple & clean zoned target for verifying
the interface, and better to not add to tgt_null.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Fixed conditional compilation bug
> - Refactored to collect conditional code additions together
> - Fixed style errors
> - Zero stack allocated value used for zone report
>
> Reported-by: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@....com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302250222.XOrw9j6z-lkp@intel.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20230224125950.214779-1-nmi@metaspace.dk/
>
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h | 18 ++++
> 2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 6368b56eacf1..37e516903867 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/major.h>
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/blkdev.h>
> +#include <linux/blkzoned.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -51,10 +52,12 @@
> | UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK \
> | UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA \
> | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY \
> - | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE)
> + | UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE \
> + | UBLK_F_ZONED)
>
> /* All UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_* should be included here */
> -#define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL (UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD)
> +#define UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ALL (UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_BASIC | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD \
> + | UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED)
>
> struct ublk_rq_data {
> struct llist_node node;
> @@ -187,6 +190,98 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(ublk_ctl_mutex);
>
> static struct miscdevice ublk_misc;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> +static void ublk_set_nr_zones(struct ublk_device *ub)
> +{
> + const struct ublk_param_basic *p = &ub->params.basic;
> +
> + if (ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_ZONED && p->chunk_sectors)
> + ub->ub_disk->nr_zones = p->dev_sectors / p->chunk_sectors;
> +}
> +
> +static void ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
> +{
> + const struct ublk_param_zoned *p = &ub->params.zoned;
> +
> + if (ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_ZONED) {
> + disk_set_max_active_zones(ub->ub_disk, p->max_active_zones);
> + disk_set_max_open_zones(ub->ub_disk, p->max_open_zones);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(struct gendisk *disk)
> +{
> + return blk_revalidate_disk_zones(disk, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static int ublk_report_zones(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector,
> + unsigned int nr_zones, report_zones_cb cb,
> + void *data)
> +{
> + struct ublk_device *ub;
> + unsigned int zone_size;
> + unsigned int first_zone;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ub = disk->private_data;
> +
> + if (!(ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_ZONED))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + zone_size = disk->queue->limits.chunk_sectors;
> + first_zone = sector >> ilog2(zone_size);
> + nr_zones = min(ub->ub_disk->nr_zones - first_zone, nr_zones);
> +
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < nr_zones; i++) {
The local variable 'i' needs to be declared in the front part
of this function body.
> + struct request *req;
> + blk_status_t status;
> + struct blk_zone info = {0};
> +
> + req = blk_mq_alloc_request(disk->queue, REQ_OP_DRV_IN, 0);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(req)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(req);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + req->__sector = sector;
Why is req->__sector set?
> +
> + ret = blk_rq_map_kern(disk->queue, req, &info, sizeof(info),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + status = blk_execute_rq(req, 0);
> + ret = blk_status_to_errno(status);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + blk_mq_free_request(req);
> +
> + ret = cb(&info, i, data);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* A zero length zone means don't ask for more zones */
> + if (!info.len) {
> + nr_zones = i;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + sector += zone_size;
> + }
I'd suggest to report as many as possible zones in one command, and
the dev_info.max_io_buf_bytes is the max allowed buffer size for one
command, please refer to nvme_ns_report_zones().
Also we are going to extend ublk in the multiple LUN/NS style, and I
guess that won't be one issue since ->report_zones() is always done on
disk level, right?
> + ret = nr_zones;
> +
> + out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +#else
> +void ublk_set_nr_zones(struct ublk_device *ub);
> +void ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(struct ublk_device *ub);
> +int ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(struct gendisk *disk);
> +#endif
> +
> static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = ub->ub_disk->queue;
> @@ -212,6 +307,9 @@ static void ublk_dev_param_basic_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
> set_disk_ro(ub->ub_disk, true);
>
> set_capacity(ub->ub_disk, p->dev_sectors);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED))
> + ublk_set_nr_zones(ub);
> }
>
> static void ublk_dev_param_discard_apply(struct ublk_device *ub)
> @@ -268,6 +366,9 @@ static int ublk_apply_params(struct ublk_device *ub)
> if (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DISCARD)
> ublk_dev_param_discard_apply(ub);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) && (ub->params.types & UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_ZONED))
> + ublk_dev_param_zoned_apply(ub);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -361,9 +462,13 @@ static void ublk_free_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> put_device(&ub->cdev_dev);
> }
>
> +
> static const struct block_device_operations ub_fops = {
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> - .free_disk = ublk_free_disk,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .free_disk = ublk_free_disk,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> + .report_zones = ublk_report_zones,
> +#endif
Define one null ublk_report_zones in #else branch of the above #ifdef, then we
can save one #ifdef.
> };
>
> #define UBLK_MAX_PIN_PAGES 32
> @@ -499,7 +604,7 @@ static int ublk_unmap_io(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> {
> const unsigned int rq_bytes = blk_rq_bytes(req);
>
> - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ && ublk_rq_has_data(req)) {
> + if ((req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ || req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DRV_IN) && ublk_rq_has_data(req)) {
> struct ublk_map_data data = {
> .ubq = ubq,
> .rq = req,
> @@ -566,6 +671,26 @@ static blk_status_t ublk_setup_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct request *req)
> case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES;
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_OPEN:
> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_OPEN;
> + break;
> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_CLOSE:
> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_CLOSE;
> + break;
> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_FINISH:
> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_FINISH;
> + break;
> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET:
> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_RESET;
> + break;
> + case REQ_OP_DRV_IN:
> + ublk_op = UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN;
> + break;
> + case REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND:
> + /* We do not support zone append yet */
> + fallthrough;
> +#endif
The above '#ifdef' is needn't, since OP_ZONE should be defined no
matter if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED is enabled or not.
> default:
> return BLK_STS_IOERR;
> }
> @@ -612,7 +737,8 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
> *
> * Both the two needn't unmap.
> */
> - if (req_op(req) != REQ_OP_READ && req_op(req) != REQ_OP_WRITE) {
> + if (req_op(req) != REQ_OP_READ && req_op(req) != REQ_OP_WRITE &&
> + req_op(req) != REQ_OP_DRV_IN) {
> blk_mq_end_request(req, BLK_STS_OK);
> return;
> }
> @@ -1535,6 +1661,15 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_start_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
> if (ret)
> goto out_put_disk;
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) &&
> + ub->dev_info.flags & UBLK_F_ZONED) {
> + disk_set_zoned(disk, BLK_ZONED_HM);
> + blk_queue_required_elevator_features(disk->queue, ELEVATOR_F_ZBD_SEQ_WRITE);
> + ret = ublk_revalidate_disk_zones(disk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_put_disk;
> + }
> +
> get_device(&ub->cdev_dev);
> ret = add_disk(disk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -1673,6 +1808,9 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_add_dev(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
> if (!IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UBLK))
> ub->dev_info.flags |= UBLK_F_URING_CMD_COMP_IN_TASK;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED))
> + ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_ZONED;
> +
> /* We are not ready to support zero copy */
> ub->dev_info.flags &= ~UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> index 8f88e3a29998..074b97821575 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@
> #define UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY (1UL << 3)
>
> #define UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY_REISSUE (1UL << 4)
> +/*
> + * Enable zoned device support
> + */
> +#define UBLK_F_ZONED (1ULL << 5)
>
> /* device state */
> #define UBLK_S_DEV_DEAD 0
> @@ -129,6 +133,12 @@ struct ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info {
> #define UBLK_IO_OP_DISCARD 3
> #define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_SAME 4
> #define UBLK_IO_OP_WRITE_ZEROES 5
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_OPEN 10
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_CLOSE 11
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_FINISH 12
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_APPEND 13
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_ZONE_RESET 15
> +#define UBLK_IO_OP_DRV_IN 34
>
> #define UBLK_IO_F_FAILFAST_DEV (1U << 8)
> #define UBLK_IO_F_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT (1U << 9)
> @@ -214,6 +224,12 @@ struct ublk_param_discard {
> __u16 reserved0;
> };
>
> +struct ublk_param_zoned {
> + __u64 max_open_zones;
> + __u64 max_active_zones;
> + __u64 max_append_size;
> +};
Is the above zoned parameter enough for future extension?
Does ZNS need extra parameter? Or some zoned new(important) features?
I highly suggest to reserve some fields for extension, given
it is one ABI interface, which is supposed to be defined well
enough from the beginning.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists