[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <688cd6cb-90ab-6834-a6f5-97080e39ca8e@leemhuis.info>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 06:36:17 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] checkpatch: warn when unknown tags are used for
links
On 27.02.23 14:25, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> On 20/01/2023 13:35, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> From: Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>
>>
>> Issue a warning when encountering URLs behind unknown tags, as Linus
>> recently stated ```please stop making up random tags that make no sense.
>> Just use "Link:"```[1]. That statement was triggered by an use of
>> 'BugLink', but that's not the only tag people invented:
>>
>> $ git log -100000 --no-merges --format=email -P \
>> --grep='^\w+:[ \t]*http' | grep -Poh '^\w+:[ \t]*http' | \
>> sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -n 20
>> 103958 Link: http
>> 418 BugLink: http
>> 372 Patchwork: http
>> 280 Closes: http
>> 224 Bug: http
>> 123 References: http
>> [...]
>>
>> Some of these non-standard tags make it harder for external tools that
>> rely on use of proper tags. One of those tools is the regression
>> tracking bot 'regzbot', which looks out for "Link:" tags pointing to
>> reports of tracked regressions.
>
> I'm sorry for the late feedback but would it be possible to add an
> exception for the "Closes" tag followed by a URL?
As I just wrote in a reply to Jakub: Not sure. Every special case makes
things harder for humans and software that looks at a commits downstream.
> This tag is useful -- at least for us when maintaining the MPTCP subtree
> -- to have tickets being automatically closed when a patch is accepted.
> I don't think this "Closes" tag is a "random one that makes no sense"
> but I agree it is not an "official" one described in the documentation.
>
> On our side, we are using GitHub to manage issues but this also works
> with GitLab and probably others. Other keywords are also accepted [1][2]
> but I guess it is best to stick with one, especially when it is already
> used according to the list provided above.
>
> Would it then be OK to allow this "Closes" tag in checkpatch.pl and
> mention it in the documentation (Submitting patches)?
>
> Or should we switch to the "Link" tag instead (and re-do the tracking
> manually)?
>
> [1]
> https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests
> [2]
> https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/issues/managing_issues.html#default-closing-pattern
For the record, let me repeat and further elaborate what I already said
on social media before you wrote your mail:
* I'm not mostly neutral here, but it was Linus who wrote "please stop
making up random tags that make no sense." in [1]. This was triggered by
a use of "BugLink:"; maybe there are tools out there that rely on that
tag, hence their users might ask for a exception as well. That's why I
think it's Linus call to grant any exceptions.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgs38ZrfPvy=nOwVkVzjpM3VFU1zobP37Fwd_h9iAD5JQ@mail.gmail.com/
* if such an exception is made, it IMHO must be documented in our
documentation, so any software and humans that rely on these tags are
aware of it.
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists