linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/19] 5.10.171-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZABSpbAUYfxqxtBS@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:39:17 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc:     Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        kuniyu@...zon.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/19] 5.10.171-rc1 review

On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 09:03:51PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/1/23 14:09, Slade Watkins wrote:
> > On 3/1/23 17:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.171 release.
> > > > There are 19 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > AFAICT we should not need this patch -- we don't have b5fc29233d28 in
> > > 5.10, so the assertion seems to be at the correct place here.
> > 
> > This (b5fc29233d28be7a3322848ebe73ac327559cdb9) appears to be in linux-5.10.y,
> > though?
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.10.y&id=b5fc29233d28be7a3322848ebe73ac327559cdb9
> > 
> > Confused,
> > -- Slade
> > 
> 
> Also confused. My script tells me that it is _not_ in v5.10.y, and that it isn't
> queued either.
> 
> Upstream commit b5fc29233d2 ("inet6: Remove inet6_destroy_sock() in sk->sk_prot->destroy().")
>   Integrated in v6.2-rc1
>   Not in 6.1.y
>   Not in 5.15.y
>   Not in 5.10.y
>   Not in 5.4.y
>   Not in 4.19.y
>   Not in 4.14.y
> 
> and:
> 
> $ git describe --contains b5fc29233d28be7a3322848ebe73ac327559cdb9
> v6.2-rc1~99^2~393^2~4
> 
> However, it looks like 62ec33b44e0 is queued everywhere.
> 
> Upstream commit 62ec33b44e0 ("net: Remove WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_forward_alloc) from sk_stream_kill_queues().")
>   Integrated in v6.2
>   Expected to be fixed in 6.1.y with next stable release (sha 29d108dc216d)
>   Expected to be fixed in 5.15.y with next stable release (sha 07c26a42efc3)
>   Expected to be fixed in 5.10.y with next stable release (sha 3ecdc3798eb9)
>   Expected to be fixed in 5.4.y with next stable release (sha a88c26a1210e)
>   Expected to be fixed in 4.19.y with next stable release (sha 60b390c291e9)
>   Expected to be fixed in 4.14.y with next stable release (sha b53a2b4858c2)

Please see the email from Kuniyuki here:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230227205531.12036-1-kuniyu@amazon.com
that should explain this.

The backport to older kernels is here:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230227211548.13923-1-kuniyu@amazon.com

If you all think this should not be in any of these kernels, please let
work with Kuniyuki to figure it out.

thanks,

greg k-h