[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9663b2e8-6f5e-0da1-822d-20cdda130386@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 21:04:07 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
X86 Kernel <x86@...nel.org>, bp@...en8.de,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, corbet@....net,
vkoul@...nel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iommu/sva: Use GFP_KERNEL for pasid allocation
On 2023/3/2 7:56, Jacob Pan wrote:
> We’re not using spinlock-protected IOASID allocation anymore, there’s
> no need for GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan<jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists