linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0afa8e6e-1676-d6a5-d679-173351fe439c@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2023 22:11:36 +0800
From:   Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iommu/vt-d: Use non-privileged mode for all PASIDs

On 2023/3/2 8:59, Jacob Pan wrote:
> For in-kernel DMA, use non-privileged access for all PASIDs to be
> consistent with RID_PASID.
> There's no need to differentiate user and kernel for in-kernel DMA. >
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index a0cb3bc851ac..9e3c056e392d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -2334,8 +2334,6 @@ static int domain_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
>   	if (level != 4 && level != 5)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID)
> -		flags |= PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE;

With above removed, PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE is not used anywhere?
Perhaps you can cleanup it to avoid dead code?

>   	if (level == 5)
>   		flags |= PASID_FLAG_FL5LP;
>   

Best regards,
baolu