[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZADJm+co4goPgr7u@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:06:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] serial: core: Start managing serial controllers
to enable runtime PM
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 09:59:58AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We want to enable runtime PM for serial port device drivers in a generic
> way. To do this, we want to have the serial core layer manage the
> registered physical serial controller devices.
>
> To do this, let's set up a struct device for the serial core controller
> as suggested by Greg and Jiri. The serial core controller devices are
> children of the physical serial port device. The serial core controller
> device is needed to support multiple different kind of ports connected
> to single physical serial port device.
>
> Let's also set up a struct device for the serial core port. The serial
> core port instances are children of the serial core controller device.
>
> With the serial core port device we can now flush pending TX on the
> runtime PM resume as suggested by Johan.
A side note. Perhaps it makes sense to also clean up documentation somehow
related to this change. For example, I found that
Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/enumeration.rst has this:
"Note that standard UARTs are not busses so there is no struct uart_device,
although some of them may be represented by struct serdev_device."
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists