[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZADLTO0NM1yb5ZLF@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 16:14:04 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
joe.jin@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode
attributes.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 03:32:01PM +1100, Imran Khan wrote:
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct kernfs_root {
>
> wait_queue_head_t deactivate_waitq;
> struct rw_semaphore kernfs_rwsem;
> + struct rw_semaphore kernfs_iattr_rwsem;
> };
>
> /* +1 to avoid triggering overflow warning when negating it */
Can you explain why we want one iattr rwsem per kernfs_root instead of
one rwsem per kernfs_node?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists