linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:14:55 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded
> into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.

As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit
if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other
architectures.

That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real
topic for bikeshedding is the name.
- Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
- Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?


>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml           | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dfe6da4796e8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/kunit/linux,kunit.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: KUnit
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> +  - David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  KUnit board used to unit test the Linux kernel in User Mode Linux (UML).
> +
> +properties:
> +  $nodename:
> +    const: "/"
> +  compatible:
> +    const: linux,kunit
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +...
> --
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
>

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)