[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 08:42:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Yassine Oudjana <yassine.oudjana@...il.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: Compatible list
cleanup
On 02/03/2023 17:08, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 02/03/23 15:12, Yassine Oudjana ha scritto:
>> From: Yassine Oudjana <y.oudjana@...tonmail.com>
>>
>> Several DT bindings of MediaTek display blocks make unnecessary use of
>> "oneOf" and "items". Remove them and replace them with enums where
>> necessary.
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
>> index 7d7cc1ab526b..52f233fe1c0f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,wdma.yaml
>> @@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ description: |
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> - oneOf:
>> - - items:
>> - - const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma
>> + const: mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma
>>
>
> This is present on all MediaTek SoCs - literally. The issue is that the driver
> currently does not support command mode panels for real, so this binding is...
> ...well, somehow in forgotten-land...
>
> I would hope that command mode panels get implemented soon(er-than-later), but
> I'll leave the choice to you and Krzysztof - I'm only providing the information
> here. :-)
Yep, if you predict now that oneOf sooner or later will come back to
these, just keep it. Does not hurt much and later re-introducing it
makes patch much more difficult to read. Therefore I prefer to have
unused oneOf than later a patch which introduces new compatible and
re-indents old one (so unneeded diff changes).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists