linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: crypto: fsl-sec4-snvs: add fsl sec 5.x compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 11:01:29 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        horia.geanta@....com, pankaj.gupta@....com, gaurav.jain@....com,
        shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, stefan@...er.ch,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: crypto: fsl-sec4-snvs: add fsl sec 5.x
 compatible

On 01/03/2023 02:56, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> Add fsl sec 5.x compatible, which is used by layerscape SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4-snvs.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4-snvs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4-snvs.yaml
> index 6878ae8127ec..1a4b4975e1d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4-snvs.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4-snvs.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ maintainers:
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - const: fsl,sec-v5.4-mon
> +          - const: fsl,sec-v5.0-mon
> +          - const: fsl,sec-v4.0-mon

This is odd... all of these are the same version then? What's the point
of having versionable compatibles if they are compatible?

Best regards,
Krzysztof