[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 09:51:15 +0100
From: Snild Dolkow <snild@...y.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] maple_tree: Fix mas_skip_node() end slot detection
Thanks, this is a significant improvement. Applying it on top of v6.1.12
allows my reproducer to pass most of the time (running as init in qemu).
Unfortunately, it's still failing around 10% of the time:
> $ for x in $(seq 100); do qemu-system-x86_64 -nographic -no-reboot -append 'console=ttyS0 panic=-1' -kernel arch/x86/boot/bzImage -initrd initrd/initrd.gz; done | tee qemu.log
> [...] > $ egrep -o 'Failed|Success' qemu.log | sort | uniq -c
> 11 Failed
> 89 Success
The failures now happen later, around 25 MiB:
> $ grep Failed qemu.log
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=1050 errno=12 total_leaks=29081600 (27 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=332 errno=12 total_leaks=23199744 (22 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=838 errno=12 total_leaks=27344896 (26 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=282 errno=12 total_leaks=22790144 (21 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=695 errno=12 total_leaks=26173440 (24 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=1064 errno=12 total_leaks=29196288 (27 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=608 errno=12 total_leaks=25460736 (24 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=443 errno=12 total_leaks=24109056 (22 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=549 errno=12 total_leaks=24977408 (23 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=630 errno=12 total_leaks=25640960 (24 MiB)
> Failed. m=0xffffffffffffffff size=8192 (1<<13) i=820 errno=12 total_leaks=27197440 (25 MiB)
Just to make sure, I went back to e15e06a8 and ran the same loop.
> $ egrep -o 'Failed|Success' qemu.log | sort | uniq -c
> 100 Success
And with the patches applied on top of master (ee3f96b1):
> $ egrep -o 'Failed|Success' qemu.log | sort | uniq -c
> 10 Failed
> 90 Success
//Snild
Powered by blists - more mailing lists