linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness grouping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 10:43:59 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] zsmalloc: fine-grained inuse ratio based fullness
 grouping

On (23/03/02 17:38), Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Otherwise I can create two big enums for fullness and stats.
> 
> Let's go with two enums at this moment since your great work is not
> tied into the problem. If that becomes really maintaince hole,
> we could tidy it up at that time.

OK.

> 
> > What's your preference on inuse_0 and inuse_100 naming? Do we
> > keep unified naming or should it be INUSE_MIN/INUSE_MAX or
> > EMPTY/FULL?
> 
> I don't have strong opinion about it. I will follow your choice. ;-)

OK :)

> prologue - seq_printf
> for (ratio = min, ratio < max; ratio++ )
>     seq_printf(s, "%lu", get_stat(ratio)
> epilogue - seq_printf
> seq_puts(s, "\n");

Let me try a loop.