[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:10:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Kai Wasserbäch <kai@....carbon-project.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] checkpatch: warn when Reported-by: is not
followed by Link:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 10:48:22 +0100 Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> > We can parse out our hash from any tag, but the problem is that the
> > current email api we use, does not allow to specify Message-ID before
> > sending, so we don't know it when generating the text.
> > We don't even know it after sending, the API is super simple:
> > https://pkg.go.dev/google.golang.org/appengine/mail
> > So we don't know what the lore link will be...
>
> That's... unfortunate, as from my understanding of things that would be
> the most important "Link:" to have in any patches that fix issues report
> by syzbot. But well, that's how it is for now. In that case I'd vote for
> this:
>
> Reported-by: syzbot@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/b/cafecafecaca0cafecafe
As you previously mentioned, patch preparers should also include
the lore link so any followup discussion is easily located.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists