[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAOnsOl+cXk9mTj5@ZenIV>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 20:18:56 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, serge@...lyn.com,
paul@...l-moore.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] vfs: avoid duplicating creds in faccessat if
possible
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 09:39:11PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> the allocation routine does not have any information about the size
> available at compilation time, so has to resort to a memset call at
> runtime. Instead, should this be:
>
> f = kmem_cache_alloc(...);
> memset(f, 0, sizeof(*f));
>
> ... the compiler could in principle inititalize stuff as indicated by
> code and emit zerofill for the rest. Interestingly, last I checked
> neither clang nor gcc knew how to do it, they instead resort to a full
> sized memset anyway, which is quite a bummer.
For struct file I wouldn't expect a win from that, TBH.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists