linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] softirq: avoid spurious stalls due to need

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:39:21 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, peterz@...radead.org,
        jstultz@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] softirq: avoid spurious stalls due to
 need_resched()

On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 17:25:35 -0800 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Just to be sure - have you seen Peter's patches?
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git core/softirq
> > 
> > I think it feeds the time limit to the callback from softirq,
> > so the local 3ms is no more?  
> 
> I might or might not have back in September of 2020.  ;-)
> 
> But either way, the question remains:  Should RCU_SOFTIRQ do time checking
> in ksoftirqd context?  Seems like the answer should be "yes", independently
> of Peter's patches.

:-o  I didn't notice, I thought that's from Dec 22, LWN was writing
about Peter's rework at that point. I'm not sure what the story is :(
And when / if any of these changes are coming downstream.