[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d3b033a-5329-be95-fe38-2cceb17b9014@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 10:32:03 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: ZhaoLong Wang <wangzhaolong1@...wei.com>, <richard@....at>,
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <vigneshr@...com>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubi: Fix deadlock caused by recursively holding work_sem
> During the processing of the bgt, if the sync_erase() return -EBUSY
> or some other error code in __erase_worker(),schedule_erase() called
> again lead to the down_read(ubi->work_sem) hold twice and may get
> block by down_write(ubi->work_sem) in ubi_update_fastmap(),
> which cause deadlock.
>
> ubi bgt other task
> do_work
> down_read(&ubi->work_sem) ubi_update_fastmap
> erase_worker # Blocked by down_read
> __erase_worker down_write(&ubi->work_sem)
> schedule_erase
> schedule_ubi_work
> down_read(&ubi->work_sem)
>
> Fix this by changing input parameter @nested of the schedule_erase() to
> 'true' to avoid recursively acquiring the down_read(&ubi->work_sem).
>
> Also, fix the incorrect comment about @nested parameter of the
> schedule_erase() because when down_write(ubi->work_sem) is held, the
> @nested is also need be true.
>
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217093
> Fixes: 2e8f08deabbc ("ubi: Fix races around ubi_refill_pools()")
> Signed-off-by: ZhaoLong Wang <wangzhaolong1@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> index 40f39e5d6dfc..26a214f016c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk,
> * @vol_id: the volume ID that last used this PEB
> * @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
> * @torture: if the physical eraseblock has to be tortured
> - * @nested: denotes whether the work_sem is already held in read mode
> + * @nested: denotes whether the work_sem is already held
> *
> * This function returns zero in case of success and a %-ENOMEM in case of
> * failure.
> @@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __erase_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wl_wrk)
> int err1;
>
> /* Re-schedule the LEB for erasure */
> - err1 = schedule_erase(ubi, e, vol_id, lnum, 0, false);
> + err1 = schedule_erase(ubi, e, vol_id, lnum, 0, true);
> if (err1) {
> spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> wl_entry_destroy(ubi, e);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists