[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c110bcc-7e65-fc01-44ec-1a79cfe49795@rocketmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 17:11:50 +0100
From: Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@...tonmail.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mfd: rt5033: Fix comments and style in includes
Hi Lee,
On 05.03.23 11:48, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, Jakob Hauser wrote:
>
>> Fix comments and remove some empty lines in rt5033-private.h. Align struct
>> rt5033_charger in rt5033.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mfd/rt5033-private.h | 17 +++++++----------
>> include/linux/mfd/rt5033.h | 7 +++----
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks
>
Thanks! Does this mean I should skip this patch in the next versions of
the patchset? Or should I just add the Acked-for-MFD-by tag of yours? In
the first case I'm not sure what base to use for the next versions of
the patchset. Sorry, I'm not so much familiar with the procedures.
Kind regards,
Jakob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists