[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYcGx_=GufsRwtRm_tCeZFvYFM+R0CGK521=DSRo+WXXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 22:48:05 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Lionel Debieve <lionel.debieve@...s.st.com>,
Li kunyu <kunyu@...china.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v5 PATCH 1/7] crypto: stm32 - Save 54 CSR registers
On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 10:37 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> The CSR registers go from 0 to 53. So the number of registers
> should be 54.
>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Hm I don't know where this misunderstanding comes from.
I think it's this tendency by some engineers to use index 1 :/
The datasheet for U8500 says:
0xF8 HASH_CSFULL HASH context full register
0xFC HASH_CSDATAIN HASH context swap data input register
0x100 HASH_CSR0 HASH context swap register 0
0x104 to 0x1CC HASH_CSR1 to 51 HASH context swap register 1 to 51
0xf8, 0xfc, 0x100 = 3 registers
0x104 to 0x1cc = 51 registers
Indeed 54.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists