[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230306160017.ptd3ogundxvus5zm@mobilestation>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 19:00:17 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, alcooperx@...il.com,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
brendan.higgins@...ux.dev, briannorris@...omium.org,
brijeshkumar.singh@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
davidgow@...gle.com, gsomlo@...il.com, gerg@...ux-m68k.org,
krzk@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, lee@...nel.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
piotrs@...ence.com, p.yadav@...com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
tonyhuang.sunplus@...il.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
vaishnav.a@...com, will@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 10/15] spi: dw: Add support for AMD Pensando Elba SoC
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 08:07:34PM -0800, Brad Larson wrote:
> The AMD Pensando Elba SoC includes a DW apb_ssi v4 controller
> with device specific chip-select control. The Elba SoC
> provides four chip-selects where the native DW IP supports
> two chip-selects. The Elba DW_SPI instance has two native
> CS signals that are always overridden.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
> ---
>
> v10 changes:
> - Delete struct dw_spi_elba, use regmap directly in priv
>
> v9 changes:
> - Add use of macros GENMASK() and BIT()
> - Change ELBA_SPICS_SHIFT() to ELBA_SPICS_OFFSET()
>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> index 26c40ea6dd12..2076cb83a11b 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,20 @@ struct dw_spi_mscc {
> void __iomem *spi_mst; /* Not sparx5 */
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Elba SoC does not use ssi, pin override is used for cs 0,1 and
> + * gpios for cs 2,3 as defined in the device tree.
> + *
> + * cs: | 1 0
> + * bit: |---3-------2-------1-------0
> + * | cs1 cs1_ovr cs0 cs0_ovr
> + */
> +#define ELBA_SPICS_REG 0x2468
> +#define ELBA_SPICS_OFFSET(cs) ((cs) << 1)
> +#define ELBA_SPICS_MASK(cs) (GENMASK(1, 0) << ELBA_SPICS_OFFSET(cs))
> +#define ELBA_SPICS_SET(cs, val) \
> + ((((val) << 1) | BIT(0)) << ELBA_SPICS_OFFSET(cs))
> +
> /*
> * The Designware SPI controller (referred to as master in the documentation)
> * automatically deasserts chip select when the tx fifo is empty. The chip
> @@ -237,6 +251,56 @@ static int dw_spi_canaan_k210_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void dw_spi_elba_override_cs(struct regmap *syscon, int cs, int enable)
> +{
> + regmap_update_bits(syscon, ELBA_SPICS_REG, ELBA_SPICS_MASK(cs),
> + ELBA_SPICS_SET(cs, enable));
> +}
> +
> +static void dw_spi_elba_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct dw_spi *dws = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> + struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio = container_of(dws, struct dw_spi_mmio, dws);
> + struct regmap *syscon = dwsmmio->priv;
> + u8 cs;
> +
> + cs = spi->chip_select;
> + if (cs < 2)
> + dw_spi_elba_override_cs(syscon, spi->chip_select, enable);
> +
> + /*
> + * The DW SPI controller needs a native CS bit selected to start
> + * the serial engine.
> + */
> + spi->chip_select = 0;
> + dw_spi_set_cs(spi, enable);
> + spi->chip_select = cs;
> +}
> +
> +static int dw_spi_elba_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct dw_spi_mmio *dwsmmio)
> +{
> + const char *syscon_name = "amd,pensando-elba-syscon";
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
Drop this since it's used only once below.
> + struct device_node *node;
> + struct regmap *syscon;
> +
> - node = of_parse_phandle(np, syscon_name, 0);
node = of_parse_phandle(dev_of_node(pdev->dev), syscon_name, 0);
> + if (!node)
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "failed to find %s\n",
> + syscon_name);
Hm, using dev_err_probe() with known error value seems overkill.
> +
> + syscon = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(syscon))
> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(syscon),
> + "syscon regmap lookup failed\n");
of_node_put() is missing in the error and success paths.
-Serge(y)
> +
> + dwsmmio->priv = syscon;
> + dwsmmio->dws.set_cs = dw_spi_elba_set_cs;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int dw_spi_mmio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int (*init_func)(struct platform_device *pdev,
> @@ -352,6 +416,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dw_spi_mmio_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "intel,thunderbay-ssi", .data = dw_spi_intel_init},
> { .compatible = "microchip,sparx5-spi", dw_spi_mscc_sparx5_init},
> { .compatible = "canaan,k210-spi", dw_spi_canaan_k210_init},
> + { .compatible = "amd,pensando-elba-spi", .data = dw_spi_elba_init},
> { /* end of table */}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_spi_mmio_of_match);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists