linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/5] random: fix try_to_generate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230306160651.2016767-2-vernon2gm@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue,  7 Mar 2023 00:06:47 +0800
From:   Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
To:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu, Jason@...c4.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        yury.norov@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, james.smart@...adcom.com,
        dick.kennedy@...adcom.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] random: fix try_to_generate_entropy() if no further cpus set

After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask
optimizations"), when NR_CPUS <= BITS_PER_LONG, small_cpumask_bits used
a macro instead of variable-sized for efficient.

If no further cpus set, the cpumask_next() returns small_cpumask_bits,
it must greater than or equal to nr_cpumask_bits, so fix it to correctly.

Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
---
 drivers/char/random.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index ce3ccd172cc8..d76f12a5f74f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ static void __cold try_to_generate_entropy(void)
 			/* Basic CPU round-robin, which avoids the current CPU. */
 			do {
 				cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, &timer_cpus);
-				if (cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
+				if (cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
 					cpu = cpumask_first(&timer_cpus);
 			} while (cpu == smp_processor_id() && num_cpus > 1);
 
-- 
2.34.1