[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfd1d81e-76a0-f8eb-e529-9f8ea1e927b6@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:09:33 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>, agross@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
kishon@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com,
bvanassche@....org, keescook@...omium.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
gpiccoli@...lia.com
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Add SM6125 compatible
string
On 6.03.2023 18:01, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>
> On 06/03/2023 13:52, Lux Aliaga wrote:
>> Document the compatible for UFS found on the SM6125.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lux Aliaga <they@...t.lgbt>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> index b517d76215e3..42422f3471b3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
>> - qcom,sc8280xp-ufshc
>> - qcom,sdm845-ufshc
>> - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>> + - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>> - qcom,sm6350-ufshc
>> - qcom,sm8150-ufshc
>> - qcom,sm8250-ufshc
>> @@ -185,6 +186,7 @@ allOf:
>> contains:
>> enum:
>> - qcom,sm6115-ufshc
>> + - qcom,sm6125-ufshc
>> then:
>> properties:
>> clocks:
> I have to apologize. I worked on a changelog for this patchset but I skipped the subject header, therefore it didn't send, and as I realized this I interrupted the process, leaving the patchset incomplete. I'll retry sending it, this time correctly.
Happens, next time resend it with a RESEND prefix, e.g. [RESEND PATCH 1/2]
Konrad
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists