[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230306183119.igudzgqj5bemqkox@google.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:31:19 -0800
From: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: fix split huge page tests
On Mar 06 11:09, Zi Yan wrote:
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
>
> Fixed two inputs to check_anon_huge() and one if condition, so the tests
> work as expected.
>
> Fixes: c07c343cda8e ("selftests/vm: dedup THP helpers")
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> index 76e1c36dd9e5..b8558c7f1a39 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void split_pmd_thp(void)
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> one_page[i] = (char)i;
>
> - if (!check_huge_anon(one_page, 1, pmd_pagesize)) {
> + if (!check_huge_anon(one_page, 4, pmd_pagesize)) {
> printf("No THP is allocated\n");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ void split_pmd_thp(void)
> }
>
>
> - if (check_huge_anon(one_page, 0, pmd_pagesize)) {
> + if (!check_huge_anon(one_page, 0, pmd_pagesize)) {
> printf("Still AnonHugePages not split\n");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ void split_pte_mapped_thp(void)
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> one_page[i] = (char)i;
>
> - if (!check_huge_anon(one_page, 1, pmd_pagesize)) {
> + if (!check_huge_anon(one_page, 4, pmd_pagesize)) {
> printf("No THP is allocated\n");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Thanks Zi -- I had this in my TODO-log, but was slow to get it it -- apologies
for the clearly buggy code, and thanks for the cleanup. I've ran these tests to
confirm (as I should have previously), and it all looks good. Can have either my
Reviewed-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>
I don't know which is more appropriate.
Best,
Zach
Powered by blists - more mailing lists