linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to inline function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZAWAyyNt0rgrpA1l@combine-ThinkPad-S1-Yoga>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 06:57:31 +0100
From:   Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@...il.com>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to
 inline function

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:06:06AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:52:51AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:15PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > 
> > Hej Deepak,
> > 
> > I have a problem in sending patchset through mutt.
> > I have been trying sending to my own mail address but it won't work.
> 
> This could be because of mutt configuration. There are some additional checks if
> you are trying to use mutt with gmail. Search over google or lore old posts to
> know more about it. The important aspect is to configure and test mutt well
> before you use it for sending out patches.
> 
> > 
> > When sending patchset I think we should use "In-Reply-To" flag and
> > include "Message-ID" to which we want this to be in series to. I tried
> > both "git send-email" feature and mutt "forwarding feature".
> 
> I have not used "git send-email", so can't help you there. But mutt has worked
> very well for me. Ensure you are reading and following the instructions from
> this page well: https://kernelnewbies.org/Outreachyfirstpatch
>

So for example from these patches: 0.patch, 1.patch
how to use "mutt -H" to send patches in one thread?

if first one is: mutt -H 0.patch
then should second one be: mutt -H 1.patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID?


> > 
> > Another issue is, how to attach patch file from inside mutt(for example: 
> > "mutt -H x.patch" from command line is used to extract header and body of a 
> > mail in mutt)?
> 
> Why do you want to do that?
> Build a patch file using "git format-patch" and then use "mutt -H" to send the
> patch. Both the commands work directly from the command line. If there is a need 
> for any additional attachments in support of your patch [configs, logs, trace as
> evidence, test outcomes etc], you can attach those from within the "mutt -H"
> execution context.
> 
> I suggest testing mutt well before you start sending any patches out by sending
> the patches to yourself. Do not use any kernel mailing list for testing.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Deepak.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Guru
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Guru