[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLW+4m=qpv4OnVuUTFOvFgeR60b40ChYRfPaxdd3fBm4dND6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 12:56:51 -0600
From: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] clk: samsung: Remove np argument from samsung_clk_init()
On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 at 08:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 23/02/2023 05:19, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> > The code using `np' argument was removed from samsung_clk_init(). Remove
> > that leftover parameter as well.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Fixes: d5e136a21b20 ("clk: samsung: Register clk provider only after registering its all clocks")
>
> Fixes should come before any other patches, so backporting is
> easier/possible.
>
Noted, thanks.
> I assume there is no dependency here with patch 1/6, so I just reversed
> their order and applied.
>
Thanks, Krzysztof! Yeah, should be no dependency, everything looks clean to me.
>
> > Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists