linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: Fix and refactor device mapping resource

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6078dce0-2797-913a-440a-d4903449f137@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:18:08 +0800
From:   Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Zhuo Song <zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/arm-cmn: Fix and refactor device mapping resource


在 2023/2/16 下午4:17, Jing Zhang 写道:
> The devm_platform_ioremap_resource() won't let the platform device
> claim resource when the ACPI companion device has already claimed it.
> If CMN-ANY except CMN600 is ACPI companion device, it will return
> -EBUSY in devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), and the driver cannot be
> successfully installed.
> 
> So let ACPI companion device call arm_cmn_acpi_probe and not claim
> resource again. In addition, the arm_cmn_acpi_probe() and
> arm_cmn_of_probe() functions are refactored to make them compatible
> with both CMN600 and CMN-ANY.
> 
> Fixes: 61ec1d875812 ("perf/arm-cmn: Demarcate CMN-600 specifics")
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index 1deb61b..beb3b37 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ static int arm_cmn_discover(struct arm_cmn *cmn, unsigned int rgn_offset)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arm_cmn600_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct arm_cmn *cmn)
> +static int arm_cmn_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct arm_cmn *cmn)
>  {
>  	struct resource *cfg, *root;
>  
> @@ -2214,12 +2214,21 @@ static int arm_cmn600_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct arm_cmn *c
>  	if (!cfg)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	root = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> -	if (!root)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	/* If ACPI defines more than one resource, such as cmn-600, then there may be
> +	 * a deviation between ROOTNODEBASE and PERIPHBASE, and ROOTNODEBASE can
> +	 * be obtained from the second resource. Otherwise, it can be considered that
> +	 * ROOT NODE BASE is PERIPHBASE. This is compatible with cmn-600 and cmn-any.
> +	 */
> +	if (pdev->num_resources > 1) {
> +		root = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> +		if (!root)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (!resource_contains(cfg, root))
> -		swap(cfg, root);
> +		if (!resource_contains(cfg, root))
> +			swap(cfg, root);
> +	} else {
> +		root = cfg;
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Note that devm_ioremap_resource() is dumb and won't let the platform
>  	 * device claim cfg when the ACPI companion device has already claimed
> @@ -2227,17 +2236,30 @@ static int arm_cmn600_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct arm_cmn *c
>  	 * appropriate name, we don't really need to do it again here anyway.
>  	 */
>  	cmn->base = devm_ioremap(cmn->dev, cfg->start, resource_size(cfg));
> -	if (!cmn->base)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (IS_ERR(cmn->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(cmn->base);
>  
>  	return root->start - cfg->start;
>  }
>  
> -static int arm_cmn600_of_probe(struct device_node *np)
> +static int arm_cmn_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct arm_cmn *cmn)
>  {
>  	u32 rootnode;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	cmn->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(cmn->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(cmn->base);
>  
> -	return of_property_read_u32(np, "arm,root-node", &rootnode) ?: rootnode;
> +	/* If of_property_read_u32() return EINVAL, it means that device tree has
> +	 * not define root-node, and root-node will return 0, which is compatible
> +	 * with cmn-600 and cmn-any.
> +	 */
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "arm,root-node", &rootnode);
> +	if (ret == -EINVAL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return rootnode;
>  }
>  
>  static int arm_cmn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -2255,16 +2277,11 @@ static int arm_cmn_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	cmn->model = (unsigned long)device_get_match_data(cmn->dev);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cmn);
>  
> -	if (cmn->model == CMN600 && has_acpi_companion(cmn->dev)) {
> -		rootnode = arm_cmn600_acpi_probe(pdev, cmn);
> -	} else {
> -		rootnode = 0;
> -		cmn->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> -		if (IS_ERR(cmn->base))
> -			return PTR_ERR(cmn->base);
> -		if (cmn->model == CMN600)
> -			rootnode = arm_cmn600_of_probe(pdev->dev.of_node);
> -	}
> +	if (has_acpi_companion(cmn->dev))
> +		rootnode = arm_cmn_acpi_probe(pdev, cmn);
> +	else
> +		rootnode = arm_cmn_of_probe(pdev, cmn);
> +
>  	if (rootnode < 0)
>  		return rootnode;
>  


ping?