Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:48:52 +0100
From:   Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@...il.com>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: vt6655: Macro with braces issue change to
 inline function

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 12:30:35PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 06:57:31AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 11:06:06AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:52:51AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:49:15PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hej Deepak,
> > > > 
> > > > I have a problem in sending patchset through mutt.
> > > > I have been trying sending to my own mail address but it won't work.
> > > 
> > > This could be because of mutt configuration. There are some additional checks if
> > > you are trying to use mutt with gmail. Search over google or lore old posts to
> > > know more about it. The important aspect is to configure and test mutt well
> > > before you use it for sending out patches.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > When sending patchset I think we should use "In-Reply-To" flag and
> > > > include "Message-ID" to which we want this to be in series to. I tried
> > > > both "git send-email" feature and mutt "forwarding feature".
> > > 
> > > I have not used "git send-email", so can't help you there. But mutt has worked
> > > very well for me. Ensure you are reading and following the instructions from
> > > this page well: https://kernelnewbies.org/Outreachyfirstpatch
> > >
> > 
> > So for example from these patches: 0.patch, 1.patch
> > how to use "mutt -H" to send patches in one thread?
> > 
> > if first one is: mutt -H 0.patch
> > then should second one be: mutt -H 1.patch In-Reply-To: Message-ID?
> 
> Try this out by sending to yourself and you will know :)
> 
> There is a section "Using git format-patch to send patchsets" in the link I sent
> in my last email. Please read that.
> 
> Deepak.
>

I tried it and it won't work.
My question itself was how to use mutt to send patchset? which is not
clear on the site.

I have no problem in sending one single patch through mutt.

To be more clear:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1666299151.git.drv@mailo.com/
at above link, you submitted patchset.

How to send this series using mutt?
If I use "mutt -H x.patch" for every patch file they are seperate emails
in my inbox.

> > 
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Another issue is, how to attach patch file from inside mutt(for example: 
> > > > "mutt -H x.patch" from command line is used to extract header and body of a 
> > > > mail in mutt)?
> > > 
> > > Why do you want to do that?
> > > Build a patch file using "git format-patch" and then use "mutt -H" to send the
> > > patch. Both the commands work directly from the command line. If there is a need 
> > > for any additional attachments in support of your patch [configs, logs, trace as
> > > evidence, test outcomes etc], you can attach those from within the "mutt -H"
> > > execution context.
> > > 
> > > I suggest testing mutt well before you start sending any patches out by sending
> > > the patches to yourself. Do not use any kernel mailing list for testing.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Deepak.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > > Guru
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Guru
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Guru

Powered by blists - more mailing lists