lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230306093336.523832b0@xps-13>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:33:36 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: spi-nor: fix memory leak when using
 debugfs_lookup()

Hi Greg,

gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote on Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:52:38 +0100:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:15:41PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > Am 2023-02-08 17:02, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:  
> > > When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it,
> > > otherwise the memory will leak over time.  To solve this, remove the
> > > lookup and create the directory on the first device found, and then
> > > remove it when the module is unloaded.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> > > Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> > > Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > > Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> > > Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
> > > Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>  
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> > 
> > one nit below I didn't notice earlier, no need to send a new
> > patch version just for that.
> > 
> > ..
> >   
> > > +void spi_nor_debugfs_shutdown(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (rootdir)
> > > +		debugfs_remove(rootdir);  
> > 
> > debugfs_remove() already has a check for NULL.
> >   
> 
> Ah, good catch, I merged this in when I applied it to my tree, thanks!

Any reasons why you did apply this patch to your tree? It is a spi-nor
fix, I would have expected it to go through mtd.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ