linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] mfd: rt5033: Fix comments and style in includes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230306091518.GD9667@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:15:18 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Beomho Seo <beomho.seo@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        Raymond Hackley <raymondhackley@...tonmail.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mfd: rt5033: Fix comments and style in includes

On Sun, 05 Mar 2023, Jakob Hauser wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On 05.03.23 11:48, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2023, Jakob Hauser wrote:
> > 
> > > Fix comments and remove some empty lines in rt5033-private.h. Align struct
> > > rt5033_charger in rt5033.h.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jakob Hauser <jahau@...ketmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/mfd/rt5033-private.h | 17 +++++++----------
> > >   include/linux/mfd/rt5033.h         |  7 +++----
> > >   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Applied, thanks
> > 
> 
> Thanks! Does this mean I should skip this patch in the next versions of the
> patchset? Or should I just add the Acked-for-MFD-by tag of yours? In the
> first case I'm not sure what base to use for the next versions of the
> patchset. Sorry, I'm not so much familiar with the procedures.

You should rebase onto -next before sending out your next submission.

This patch should vanish from the set.

If it doesn't, please wait another 24hrs and try again.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]