[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230306120558.00f614fb@xps-13>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 12:05:58 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: spi-nor: fix memory leak when using
debugfs_lookup()
Hi Greg,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote on Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:13:33 +0100:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:33:36AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote on Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:52:38 +0100:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:15:41PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > > Am 2023-02-08 17:02, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> > > > > When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it,
> > > > > otherwise the memory will leak over time. To solve this, remove the
> > > > > lookup and create the directory on the first device found, and then
> > > > > remove it when the module is unloaded.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
> > > > > Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> > > > > Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > > > > Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> > > > > Cc: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
> > > > > Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> > > >
> > > > one nit below I didn't notice earlier, no need to send a new
> > > > patch version just for that.
> > > >
> > > > ..
> > > >
> > > > > +void spi_nor_debugfs_shutdown(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + if (rootdir)
> > > > > + debugfs_remove(rootdir);
> > > >
> > > > debugfs_remove() already has a check for NULL.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ah, good catch, I merged this in when I applied it to my tree, thanks!
> >
> > Any reasons why you did apply this patch to your tree? It is a spi-nor
> > fix, I would have expected it to go through mtd.
>
> It's been sitting around for a month, I assumed it was lost, so I picked
> it up.
Sorry if it took too long, the merge window also happened during that
time, we are collecting patches now that 6.3-rc1 has been released.
Next time don't hesitate to ping first ;-)
> I can revert it if you don't want me to take it for 6.3-final
> through my driver core tree.
I'll let spi-nor maintainers decide what they prefer.
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists