linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] virtio/vsock: free skb on data copy failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:07:42 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...rdevices.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] virtio/vsock: free skb on data copy failure

On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 11:08:38PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This fixes two things in case when 'memcpy_to_msg()' fails:
>1) Update credit parameters of the socket, like this skbuff was
>   copied to user successfully. This is needed because when skbuff was
>   received it's length was used to update 'rx_bytes', thus when we drop
>   skbuff here, we must account rest of it's data in 'rx_bytes'.
>2) Free skbuff which was removed from socket's queue.
>
>Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 30b0539990ba..ffb1af4f2b52 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -379,8 +379,12 @@ virtio_transport_stream_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 		spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
> 		err = memcpy_to_msg(msg, skb->data, bytes);
>-		if (err)
>+		if (err) {
>+			skb_pull(skb, skb->len);
>+			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, skb);
>+			consume_skb(skb);

I'm not sure it's the right thing to do, if we fail to copy the content
into the user's buffer, I think we should queue it again.

In fact, before commit 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace
virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff"), we used to remove the packet from the
rx_queue, only if memcpy_to_msg() was successful.

Maybe it is better to do as we did before and use skb_peek() at the
beginning of the loop and __skb_unlink() when skb->len == 0.

Thanks,
Stefano

> 			goto out;
>+		}
>
> 		spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
>-- 
>2.25.1
>