linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: q6prm: fix incorrect clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Mar 2023 12:45:37 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...cinc.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: q6prm: fix incorrect clk_root passed to
 ADSP

On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 13:29:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The second to last argument is clk_root (root of the clock), however the
> code called q6prm_request_lpass_clock() with clk_attr instead
> (copy-paste error).  This effectively was passing value of 1 as root
> clock which worked on some of the SoCs (e.g. SM8450) but fails on
> others, depending on the ADSP.  For example on SM8550 this "1" as root
> clock is not accepted and results in errors coming from ADSP.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: q6prm: fix incorrect clk_root passed to ADSP
      commit: 65882134bc622a1e57bd5928ac588855ea2e3ddd

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark