[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df3997ed-a844-597b-fbb1-154caad78543@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:49:34 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove redundant check in handle_mm_fault
On 06.03.23 03:49, Haifeng Xu wrote:
> mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() has checked whether current memcg_in_oom is
> set or not, so remove the check in handle_mm_fault().
"mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize() will returned immediately if memcg_in_oom
is not set, so remove the check from handle_mm_fault()".
However, that requires now always an indirect function call -- do we
care about dropping that optimization?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists