[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAX2k9gW1AA88T/P@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 16:20:03 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, techsupport@...systems.com,
Paul Demetrotion <pdemetrotion@...systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] gpio: ws16c48: Migrate to the regmap API
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:59:53AM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
...
> - raw_spinlock_t lock;
> + spinlock_t lock;
This is a regression.
That said, do we need a support of raw spin locks in the regmap IRQ?
...
> + u8 irq_mask[WS16C48_NUM_IRQS / WS16C48_NGPIO_PER_REG];
Can this be a bitmap? Or is it too over engineered with it?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists