[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEivzxf8HKs2FJwTohzGVcb0TRNy9QJbEALC3dni3zx+tOb9Gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 15:09:31 +0100
From: Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] fuse: add fuse device ioctl(FUSE_DEV_IOC_REINIT)
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:26 PM Bernd Schubert
<bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/23 20:37, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > This ioctl aborts fuse connection and then reinitializes it,
> > sends FUSE_INIT request to allow a new userspace daemon
> > to pick up the fuse connection.
> >
> > Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> > Cc: Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>
> > Cc: Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
> > Cc: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: criu@...nvz.org
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > fs/fuse/dev.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/fuse.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > index 737764c2295e..0f53ffd63957 100644
> > --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
> > @@ -2187,6 +2187,112 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);
> >
> > +static int fuse_reinit_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
> > +{
> > + struct fuse_iqueue *fiq = &fc->iq;
> > + struct fuse_dev *fud;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + if (fc->conn_gen + 1 < fc->conn_gen)
> > + return -EOVERFLOW;
> > +
> > + fuse_abort_conn(fc);
> > + fuse_wait_aborted(fc);
>
> Shouldn't this also try to flush all data first?
I think we should. Thanks for pointing to that!
I've read all your comments and I'll prepare -v2 series soon.
Thanks a lot, Bernd!
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists