[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJedcCx13sz5h=fWvJU38P_1W-zd6yZe=iSMpO28_E_kAqUGDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 23:03:57 +0800
From: Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To: Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: "zyytlz.wz@....com" <zyytlz.wz@....com>,
Kyrie Wu (吴晗) <Kyrie.Wu@...iatek.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"alex000young@...il.com" <alex000young@...il.com>,
Bin Liu (刘彬) <bin.liu@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"1395428693sheep@...il.com" <1395428693sheep@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] media: mtk-jpeg: Fix use after free bug due to
uncanceled work
The timer function was set in mtk_jpeg_probe with
mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work function.
And the worker is started in mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run.
There are two functions (mtk_jpeg_enc_irq and mtk_jpeg_dec_irq) which
may cancel the worker.
They are used as IRQ handler function which is saved as function
pointer in a variable.
In mtk_jpeg_probe, they are registered by devm_request_irq:
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
jpeg_irq,
jpeg->variant->irq_handler,
0,
pdev->name, jpeg);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request jpeg_irq %d (%d)\n",
jpeg_irq, ret);
return ret;
}
However, if we remove the module without triggering the irq, the
worker will never be removed.
As for the schedule, mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run and
mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run will start the worker.
The schedule invoking is quite complicated. As far as I know, the
invoking chain is as follows:
v4l2_m2m_init->v4l2_m2m_device_run_work->v4l2_m2m_try_run
the v4l2_m2m_device_run_work function is also a worker which is set in
v4l2_m2m_init and started in
v4l2_m2m_schedule_next_job.
Before calling remove function, the mtk_jpeg_release was invoked to
release the related resource.
v4l2_m2m_cancel_job will cancel the job by calling
m2m_dev->m2m_ops->job_abort(m2m_ctx->priv).
But this will only cancel the current queue by
list_del(&m2m_dev->curr_ctx->queue);
I think this can not cancel the posted task mentioned before. So I
think if mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work
is working on, and using jpeg->m2m_dev after freeing it in
mtk_jpeg_remove, it will cause a UAF bug.
static int mtk_jpeg_release(struct file *file)
{
struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = video_drvdata(file);
struct mtk_jpeg_ctx *ctx = mtk_jpeg_fh_to_ctx(file->private_data);
mutex_lock(&jpeg->lock);
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&ctx->ctrl_hdl);
[1] v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
v4l2_fh_del(&ctx->fh);
v4l2_fh_exit(&ctx->fh);
kfree(ctx);
mutex_unlock(&jpeg->lock);
return 0;
}
void v4l2_m2m_ctx_release(struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx)
{
/* wait until the current context is dequeued from job_queue */
[2] v4l2_m2m_cancel_job(m2m_ctx);
vb2_queue_release(&m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx.q);
vb2_queue_release(&m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx.q);
kfree(m2m_ctx);
}
Note that all of this is static analysis, which may be false positive.
Feel free to tell me if there is something I've missed.
Regard,
Zheng
Irui Wang (王瑞) <Irui.Wang@...iatek.com> 于2023年3月7日周二 18:23写道:
>
> Dear Angelo and Zheng,
>
> Thanks for your patch and comments.
>
> Dear Kyrie,
>
> Please help to check this, thanks.
>
> Best Regards
>
> On Tue, 2023-03-07 at 10:49 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 07/03/23 10:27, Zheng Hacker ha scritto:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there anyone who can help with this? I can provide more details
> > > like invoking chain if needed.
> > >
> >
> > Providing more details is always good. Please do.
> >
> > Meanwhile, adding Irui Wang to the loop: he's doing mtk-jpeg.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Angelo
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zheng
> > >
> > > Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com> 于2023年3月6日周一 14:28写道:
> > > >
> > > > In mtk_jpeg_probe, &jpeg->job_timeout_work is bound with
> > > > mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work. Then mtk_jpeg_dec_device_run
> > > > and mtk_jpeg_enc_device_run may be called to start the
> > > > work.
> > > > If we remove the module which will call mtk_jpeg_remove
> > > > to make cleanup, there may be a unfinished work. The
> > > > possible sequence is as follows, which will cause a
> > > > typical UAF bug.
> > > >
> > > > Fix it by canceling the work before cleanup in the
> > > > mtk_jpeg_remove
> > > >
> > > > CPU0 CPU1
> > > >
> > > > |mtk_jpeg_job_timeout_work
> > > > mtk_jpeg_remove |
> > > > v4l2_m2m_release |
> > > > kfree(m2m_dev); |
> > > > |
> > > > | v4l2_m2m_get_curr_priv
> > > > | m2m_dev->curr_ctx //use
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > index 969516a940ba..364513e7897e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/jpeg/mtk_jpeg_core.c
> > > > @@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ static int mtk_jpeg_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > static int mtk_jpeg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct mtk_jpeg_dev *jpeg = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > -
> > > > + cancel_delayed_work(&jpeg->job_timeout_work);
> > > > pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > video_unregister_device(jpeg->vdev);
> > > > v4l2_m2m_release(jpeg->m2m_dev);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists