[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4330af6a-ce97-53ed-f675-6d3d0ac8f32f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 09:28:21 -0600
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Mario.Limonciello@....com,
amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com, Mastan.Katragadda@....com,
Arungopal.kondaveeti@....com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 8/8] soundwire: amd: add pm_prepare callback and pm ops
support
> +static int amd_resume_child_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct sdw_slave *slave = dev_to_sdw_dev(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!slave->probed) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "skipping device, no probed driver\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!slave->dev_num_sticky) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "skipping device, never detected on bus\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> + return 0;
> + ret = pm_request_resume(dev);
I still don't get why the test above was needed. It's racy and brings
limited benefits.
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(dev, "pm_request_resume failed: %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists