linux-kernel - [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix device node validation for mailbox transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230307162324.891866-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date:   Tue,  7 Mar 2023 16:23:24 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     sudeep.holla@....com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix device node validation for mailbox transport

When mailboxes are used as a transport it is possible to setup the SCMI
transport layer, depending on the underlying channels configuration, to use
one or two mailboxes, associated, respectively, to one or two, distinct,
shared memory areas: any other combination should be treated as invalid.

Add more strict checking of SCMI mailbox transport device node descriptors.

Fixes: 5c8a47a5a91d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.19
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
index 0d9c9538b7f4..112c285deb97 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/mailbox.c
@@ -52,6 +52,39 @@ static bool mailbox_chan_available(struct device_node *of_node, int idx)
 					   "#mbox-cells", idx, NULL);
 }
 
+static int mailbox_chan_validate(struct device *cdev)
+{
+	int num_mb, num_sh, ret = 0;
+	struct device_node *np = cdev->of_node;
+
+	num_mb = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells");
+	num_sh = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "shmem", NULL);
+	/* Bail out if mboxes and shmem descriptors are inconsistent */
+	if (num_mb <= 0 || num_sh > 2 || num_mb != num_sh) {
+		dev_warn(cdev, "Invalid channel descriptor for '%s'\n",
+			 of_node_full_name(np));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (num_sh > 1) {
+		struct device_node *np_tx, *np_rx;
+
+		np_tx = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", 0);
+		np_rx = of_parse_phandle(np, "shmem", 1);
+		/* SCMI Tx and Rx shared mem areas have to be distinct */
+		if (!np_tx || !np_rx || np_tx == np_rx) {
+			dev_warn(cdev, "Invalid shmem descriptor for '%s'\n",
+				 of_node_full_name(np));
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		of_node_put(np_tx);
+		of_node_put(np_rx);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int mailbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
 			      bool tx)
 {
@@ -64,6 +97,10 @@ static int mailbox_chan_setup(struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo, struct device *dev,
 	resource_size_t size;
 	struct resource res;
 
+	ret = mailbox_chan_validate(cdev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	smbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*smbox), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!smbox)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.34.1